When developing a cloud strategy, you will likely come across AWS RDS and Azure SQL. Which one should you use? You'll want to evaluate which one meets your needs better before making a decision. As cloud databases become more critical for emerging initiatives, next-gen applications, and digital business-use cases, it's more important than ever to understand the differences between SQL servers on AWS vs. Azure.
About AWS cloud databases
AWS has different purpose-built and fully managed cloud databases to meet various requirements. It aims to help businesses save time by taking care of repetitive tasks like server patching, provisioning, and backups. It also provides continuous monitoring, self-healing storage, and automated scaling to help you focus on developing applications. AWS databases are highly scalable, making them ideal for all app development requirements.
While learning about an SQL server on AWS vs. Azure, you’ll also discover other cloud databases and tools, such as Amazon RDS, a collection of high-performance managed services that lets you operate, set up, or scale databases in the cloud cost-effectively and flexibly. You can pick engines like SQL Server, Amazon Aurora with MySQL or PostGre, Oracle, PostgreSQL, or MariaDB. You can also deploy it on-premise using Amazon RDS on AWS Outposts service.
About Azure database
Azure offers relational databases like SQL Database, an intuitive, fully-managed relational platform for cloud applications. It is constantly up-to-date with automatic backups, updates, and provisioning, allowing end users to innovate. With a serverless model, it adapts quickly to evolving application needs and supports high scalability requirements. Threat detection and multiple protection layers help keep your data secure.
Azure also offers database tools for specific databases, such as PostgreSQL and MySQL, as well as SQL Managed Instance and SQL Server on Virtual Machines.
Which platform is for you?
Deciding to use an SQL server on AWS vs. Azure can be overwhelming, but a web-based database access and management platform should allow you to use either or both. Besides offering versatility, this solution lets you overcome the challenges of AWS or Azure.
Azure posts challenges in database monitoring, such as blocking queries, CPU and memory bottlenecks, and identifying failed connections. AWS may have issues like metadata inconsistencies, orphan tables, and dictionary mismatches caused by full storage, incorrect results for queries using index merge optimization, and file size limits for MySQL.